Practical review
Skriptr
AI native academic writing workspace that lets users organize sources, research, write, and use AI grounded in project materials with citations.
The test, in brief
FailedThe task could not be completed.
The tested task failed in this session. Read the findings for what happened.
What we tried
Add a website source to the project Library and ask the AI to answer using only that source with citations.
The task outcome is “Failed,” but the source completion label says “Main task completed.” Read this result with that discrepancy in mind.
The positives
What worked well
Clean split screen workspace, polished editor, and the Library successfully saved and displayed the website source itself.
Worth knowing
What we noticed
A website source was successfully saved in Library and was readable/open inside Skriptr, but the AI assistant repeatedly claimed the library was empty and could not use the saved source for a source grounded answer.
More detail from the test
After the Wikipedia Artificial Intelligence page was added and visibly remained in Library, the assistant repeatedly claimed the project library was empty and could not access that source. It fell back to live web search instead, even after refresh and after the source was explicitly selected/opened in the project.
Before you decide
A snapshot of one experience.
This review describes the task tested on Aug 17, 2026. The product may have changed since then, and features outside that task were not fully assessed.
Keep exploring.
See what else we’ve reviewed in Writing & content.